|
weatheredeyec57 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
indeed correct sir.
mavaddat (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
If by "ego" you mean consciousness, then I agree that this is a very important topic which remains to be solved. Rupert Sheldrake, however, adds nothing to our understanding of consciousness. He might as well be postulating invisible faeries as the source and cause of consciousness.
weatheredeyec57 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
then whats the ego and what is it for
ryan626 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i love the fact of people (with no evidence)
hold their faith to be true- when really most christians for example, dont even practice it routinely, but then require proof for something remarkable like these discoveries and leave belief behind.
unsound64 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Ehm, where's the evidence? Where's those video's?
susiesorgenfrei (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Mate, this is great! Where can I see the rest of it?
fondiziac (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Thanks for uploading this!
ossiorn (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I thought science was sarcasm!
mavaddat (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I understand your frustration at the scientific community's almost unanimous rejection of Sheldrake's theory, but sarcasm does not replace science. The fact of the matter is that "morphic resonance" is a useless theory. It explains as much as solipsism (the idea that nothing exists but my mind and it creates all of reality as I experience it), which is precisely nothing at all.
ossiorn (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Please,send money to my Unicorn charity Mavaddat.
It is very urgent that this species does not become extinct,and you know some skeptics are even saying the unicorns are already extinct,for they can find no proof of their existence!
Oh No!
|
